Wednesday, January 6, 2010
Mahbubani Talks the Talk But Can He Walk the Walk?
The West is currently under a grave misapprehension about their role as leaders of international law. They are suffering from a distorted way of thinking, in which they assume that their military and economic prowess can still bring any country to its knees and automatically convert the most hostile nation to a Western mode of operating. In Kishore Mahbubani’s article, “The Case Against the West,” he examines how very flawed the United States is, this nation of freedom and opportunity wrongly believing that their interventions were for the better and that because of our democratic and economically developed regime, we are automatically exempt from being a fundamental source of the dangers that threat our security and international order. Mahbubani depicts a rather glum opinion of the West, and perhaps with reason. Was it not the West who hypothesized that the “invading U.S. troops would be welcomed with roses thrown at their feet by happy Iraqis,” a reception thrown in their honor, only to be met with armed resistance and hostility? Is it not the West who has consistently draped the United States in a cloak of invincibility and superiority, perhaps with clear, concise proof, but more often than not, an egotistical approach to world leadership? And yet, Mahbubani makes the grand claim that the United States has transformed from “the world’s primary problem solver to...its single biggest liability.” While he has nine pages of material to work with, it is very easy for him to only paint a portrait of all the failures of the United States, but at the same time, he often provides unclear justifications for such accusations. Mahbubani talks the talk but when it comes to getting down to the nit and gritty, such as explaining why he thinks the United States fails to live up to the provisions of international law on human rights, he is unable to walk the walk. My opinion? Sure, the United States is flawed, but no more than other country or person and what it comes down to is that there is always room for improvement.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Doesn't he suggest, however, that it's precisely because the West created such an important set of international principles (democracy, rule of law, social justice) that our failure to adhere to them has been such a disaster?
ReplyDelete